Several studies* have been performed on the linkage among team building, team cohesion, and team performance. An integrated team will achieve improvements in performance by developing the right "Team Culture" and adopting the behaviors needed to support and reinforce that culture. A strong Team Culture leads to reduction of waste, duplication, unnecessary processes and procedures. Most importantly, it leads to the willingness to succeed.
Many times there is limited or no effort taken to create a joint view of the goals that should be achieved, build trust among team members, and to integrate the team. As a result, the team is not productive as a unit as they become "disengaged". Disengaged employees are 33% less productive on average according several reports*. This costs companies a lot of money, risk, and time.
To keep clinicians and consultants in the loop, Advanced Clinical has built our "Team Integration Method". Our method succeeds in creating a completely harmonized team, whether working on-site or off-site to ensure maximum employee engagement, productivity and overall performance.
Advanced Clinical believes our consultants should be "close" with not only their colleagues on a project, but the project managers and the client's team as well. Bonding exercises and introductions take place before our clinical trials. Mutual respect and complete communication is ongoing to keep workplace karma good, and, ultimately, to ensure successful trials completion.We've launched our “Design Your Dream Job” contest to identify the best ways to make employees happy and productive in the workplace. You could win a $200 gift card to any store of your choosing, an iPod shuffle, and maybe the job of your dreams.
Enter today.*Sources: Bloom, G. A., Stevens, D. E., and Wickwire, T. L. (2003). Expert coaches’ perceptions of team building. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology. 15: 129-143.
Crron, A.V., Brawley, L.R., and Widmeyer, W. N. (1985). The Group Environment Questionnaire.
Carron, A.V., Bray, S.R., and Eys, M.A. (2002).Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sports Sciences, 20, 119-126.
Dirks, K.T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6) 1004-1012.
Ebbeck, V. and Gibbons, S. L. (1998). The effect of a team building program on the self-conceptions of grade 6 and 7 physical education students. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20; 300-310.
Everett, J. J., Smith, R. E., and Williams, K.D. (1992). Effects of team cohesion and identifiably on social loafing in relay swimming performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 23: 311-324.
Kozub, S.A. & Button, C.J. (2000). The influence of a competitive outcome on perceptions of cohesion in rugby and swimming teams. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 31: 82-95.
Landers, D. M. and Luschen, G. (1974). Team performance outcomes and the cohesiveness of competitive coacting groups. International Review of Sports Sociology. 5: 57-69.
Martin, R. and Davids, K. (1995). The effects of group development techniques on a professional athletic team. The Journal of Social Psychology, 135 (4) 533-535.
Meyer, B.B., Wenger, M.S. (1998). Athletes and adventure education: An Empirical Investigation. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 29, 243-266.
Murphy, J. M. (2001). The effect of a one-time team building exercise on team cohesion.
Sencecal, J., Loughead, T.M., and Bloom (2008). A season-long team-building intervention: examining the effect of team goal setting on cohesion. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 30, 186-199.See
www.advancedclinical.com
